Reasons for financial disintermediation

In the financial arena, this question translates into whether public officials must foster a more transparent regulatory arena -- one in which citizens can bypass financial institutions to carry out investment activities and fulfill long-term goals. Definition Financial disintermediation means bank customers directly engage in financial activities without the guidance and support of bank personnel. One specific area where disintermediation has emerged is in the investment world, namely the market mechanism individuals must follow to buy, sell or hold financial products.

Reasons for financial disintermediation

Financial conglomerates are groups that combine banking, securities, and insurance activities within one organization. Consolidation has been driven by the search for revenue enhancement and cost savings and has been encouraged by improvements in information technology.

So far most consolidation has been within sector and country. Nevertheless, some cross-sector groups of impressive size have been formed. Although the external risks facing financial firms have not changed in essence, combining different activities within one organization presents new challenges both for the group's management as well as for regulators.

In this paper we discuss the most important issues in this area. Sheer size by itself, after all, does not merit the extensive regulation to which financial firms are subject. The reasons cited for banks are the possibility of bank runs, systemic crises, and moral hazard due to a lender of last resort and concerns regarding consumer protection.

For insurance firms, the main reasons are concerns regarding consumer protection and, more generally, financial stability. Given the good reasons that exist for regulation and supervision, within what institutional framework does this take place? Consolidation in the financial sector, for instance, would require closer coordination of regulation across the banking, securities, and insurance sectors.

In the fourth section of this paper, we describe the—European—framework, with special attention to the Dutch situation. Since financial conglomerates were formed relatively early in the Netherlands, the regulatory response had to be formulated ahead of the curve as well.

We highlight the motivations that played a role in creating the present Dutch regulatory structure. Regulators are not the only stakeholders interested in the risk profile of financial firms.

Many firms commit sizable resources themselves to monitor and manage risk. However, received wisdom is that in the absence of market imperfections, risk management does not add any value.

The reasons for managing risk are thus based on violations of the assumptions of the Modigliani-Miller irrelevance theorems. We discuss the most important digressions in turn. Given that both management and regulators are interested in the risk profile of financial firms, they have a shared interest in accurate measurement and, consecutively, management of risk.

We then briefly outline measurement methods, primarily to discuss the most important hurdles that have to be taken before a firm-wide risk management system can be implemented adequately. Finally, we discuss the interplay between the objectives of supervisors and the goals of financial conglomerates.

Are these objectives in line with each other, or are there areas in which opposite interests are evident? In what way can supervisory regulation support the developments of firm-wide risk management systems, and is this beneficial to the [End Page ] industry?

Reasons for financial disintermediation

The main issue addressed is what the framework for coming to an adequate risk management process, and thus a satisfactory level of capital, should look like.

The central tenet here is the supervised institution's responsibility in this area. The concluding section summarizes our findings.

Three Waves of a New Financial Internet

The Rise of Financial Conglomerates An obvious definition of a financial conglomerate is a group of firms that predominantly deal with finance that is, banks.

In financial regulation, however, it has acquired a slightly different meaning:Fintech investments have tripled in Reasons for this growth include a rising demand for transparency and disintermediation, and a growing affinity for technology in the finance sector.

withdrawal of funds from interest-bearing deposit accounts when rates on competing financial instruments, such as money market mutual funds, stocks, bonds, and .

History and major causes of US banking disintermediation further accommodated the process of banking disintermediation.

The US financial system is widely known to be of the reasons of the rise in residential mortgage interest. THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS OF MICROECONOMIC, AND MACROECONOMIC CAUSES AND THEIR GLOBAL EFFECTS Abstract The global fi nancial crisis of has been characterized as the most severe economic calamity since the global great depression of the early s.

Reasons for financial disintermediation

In this paper we argue that its magnitude in terms of disintermediation. TAXATION OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION IN INDUSTRIALISED COUNTRIES to mention a few reasons. (Com petition between financial centres) − Disintermediation: a growing array of financial institutions − Demographics (need to stimulate private savings to fund pensions).

Disintermediation refers to: (1) the investing of funds that would normally have been placed in a bank or other financial institution (financial intermediaries) directly into investment instruments issued by the ultimate users of the funds.

Disintermediation - Wikipedia