The Second Amendment states "a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
On June 28,the Supreme Court made a landmark ruling expanding the right to bear arms in cities and states.
On June 26,the Supreme Court made a landmark ruling upholding the right of individuals to bear arms for hunting and for self-defense. Before the landmark ruling, the most visible issue under debate was whether the federal government should provide a stronger role in regulating handguns and related firearms.
Methods of regulation include making it harder for dangerous persons to buy a gun, improving safety of guns, regulating sales at gun shows, and more.
The most visible group that is in favor of more federal regulations is Handgun Control the Brady Centeralong with its affiliate organization, the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence.
Constitution guarantees individuals the right to own and carry guns. They are concerned that federal regulations will continue to increase until owning a handgun will be difficult to achieve, infringing on their Constitutional rights.
They also argue that if law-abiding citizens have guns, they are safer from criminals, bringing crime rates down. Constitution does not guarantee individuals unrestricted rights to own and carry guns.
Further, they argue that when more people have guns, deaths and injuries from guns increase. It is up to the rest of us to determine which positions are true.
We may not agree with the conclusions of either group, but we need to know whether the U. Constitution guarantees the right for individuals to own and carry guns. We also need to know whether more guns mean more deaths and injuries. For example, the Second Amendment to the U.
Death by "Gun Control" by Aaron Zelman and Richard W. Stevens Introduction by James Bovard. Unfortunately, this book is now out of stock. Comes with 2 FREE Gran'pa Jack booklets!. See our documentary film - "Innocents Betrayed". To one life-long Second Amendment supporter, the Parkland shooting showed that legal guns still reach dangerous shooters. Second Amendment & Gun Control. The latest news coverage, opinion and information on Second Amendment rights and gun control.
Constitution states, Gun control the second amendment well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
A key case before this landmark ruling, according to both sides of the argument, is United States v. The Supreme Court examined the original records of Congress to determine why the Second Amendment was written into the Constitution. They clarified the intent of the Second Amendment with this statement: With obvious purpose to assure the continuation and render possible the effectiveness of such forces, the declaration and guarantee of the Second Amendment were made.
It must be interpreted and applied with that end in view. The Supreme Court further explained that at the time the Second Amendment was adopted, Congress favored using the civilian population adult males as the State Militia for national defense rather than building an army of professional soldiers.
The purpose of the Second Amendment was to support the national defense. Therefore, the only purpose for which owning and carrying a gun is protected under the Second Amendment is as part of "a well regulated militia," acting on behalf of the national government.
However, the NRA has an additional interpretation of the ruling: More recently, an individual right to bear arms was affirmed in the trial court of U. Although Emerson lost the case, the NRA regards the opinions of two of the appellate judges as support for their position that the right to bear arms is an individual right.
Regarding the Emerson case, the Brady Center states, "This suggestion that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms is contrary to the holdings of the U. Supreme Court and every other federal appellate court to consider the issue.
The NRA, on the other hand, concluded that the Miller ruling supports the right of individuals to keep and bear arms, as long as they do so for a military purpose.
Individuals have the right to bear arms for hunting or for self-defense and do not need to do so for a military purpose. The Brady Center argues that when the civilian population has more access to guns, more teens and children die from gun wounds.
For example, during a year when over 5, teens and children died from gun wounds in the USA, in Great Britain, where gun ownership is very restricted, 19 teens and children died from gun wounds.
The Brady Center also argues for laws that promote gun safety, such as requiring child-proof locks on gun triggers. They have praised Smith and Wesson gun maker for starting to make guns with safety features. The Brady Center asserts that the public good is served by enacting laws that more carefully protect children from access to guns.
The basic reason NRA is against regulation of gun ownership is the belief that each piece of federal regulation will lead to more until finally, gun ownership will be very restricted.
Research findings provided by the NRA conclude that gun ownership results in protection from crime. They argue that when more people have guns, crime rates are reduced. They argue that research results provided by the Brady Center and others in favor of gun controls are false or overstated.
If the federal government requires safety features, that will provide momentum to the federal government for passing more regulations. Is this decline in deaths caused by enforcement of the "Brady Bill," allowing fewer dangerous people to have guns?
Is it from having more people in prisons? In truth, we do not know yet why deaths from guns are declining. The NRA position that restricting access to guns causes more crime because then only criminals will have gunsis not supported by evidence at a national level.Comprehensive presentation of gun control and Second Amendment issues; analysis of firearms statistics, research, and gun control policies.
Young activists calling for more gun control legislation should be more ambitious in their nationwide effort and focus on repealing the Second Amendment, according to retired U.S. Supreme Court. The Seven Myths of Gun Control: Reclaiming the Truth About Guns, Crime, and the Second Amendment [Richard Poe, David Horowitz] on ashio-midori.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Today, the right to own a gun is under assault like never before. Every time a . In short, there’s plenty of room under the Second Amendment for gun control. In recognizing the legitimacy of many gun laws, the Supreme Court did no more than adhere to the text of the Second.
Aug 06, · Read the latest articles and commentary on gun control and gun rights at US News. Justice Stevens and his colleagues were not saying, a mere seven years ago, that the gun-control legislation in dispute in Heller alone was constitutional within the confines of the Second Amendment.