For example if you check the Wikipedia entry for Authoritarianism you will find this entry: Authoritarianism is a form of social organization characterized by submission to authority. It is opposed to individualism and democracy.
Journal of Latin American Studies, Vol.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http: Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. We will write a custom essay sample on Authoratarian and Totalitarian Dictators Order now More Essay Examples on JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in to build trusted digital archives for scholarship.
We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources.
But there is still disagreement over the seemingly ideological, polemical and indiscriminate use of the term totalitarian dictatorship as an analytic concept and tool to guide foreign policy formulation. Others argue against the comparability of right- and left-wing regimes.
For a review of the scholarly debate concerning the concept of 2 3 totalitarianism, see Carl J. The article was revised with these and other comments in mind.
Sondrol and totalitarian dictators Table i. Key dichotomies between authoritarian and totalitarian dictators centre around three foci shaping the subsequent discussion.
Authoritarians view themselves as individual beings, largely content to control and maintain the status quo. Totalitarian self-conceptions are typically teleological. Lacking the binding appeal of ideology, authoritarians support their rule by a mixture of instilling fear and granting rewards to loyal collaborators, engendering a kleptocracy.
Table I highlights these differences. Both Castro and Stroessner totally dominated their respective regimes for over thirty years, becoming by the early I98os the longest-ruling leaders in the Western hemisphere. In both regimes a single mass-based party structure penetrated civil society, buckling it to the regime.
Beyond those similarities, however, Castro and Stroessner diverge almost completely, occupying polar extremes both in ideological orientation and in their role conceptions concerning the ends of political power.
CastroandStroessner compared 6o0 This paper analyses and explicates the diametrics of the totalitarian and authoritarian dictatorship via comparison of Castro and Stroessner.
Examining how closely Castro and Stroessner approximate the prototypical models helps to determine the utility of these intellectual constructs and whether it is justified for scholars indiscriminately to label Castro totalitarian and Stroessner authoritarian.
The study shows that Castro is quintessentially totalitarian in his charismatic appeal, utopian functional role and public, transformative utilisation of power. Stroessner remained at base an authoritarian dictator, lacking ideological vision and employing tyrannical power for essentially private ends.
Moreover, both dictators share a common, Latin American caudillo heritage buttressing their power, conceptually absent from the larger, general taxonomy. A conclusion summarises these findings and argues for retention but reevaluation of the totalitarian construct.
Totalitarianand authoritariandictators The nature of dictatorship informs a long history of scholarship. The statesman must be absolute, argues Plato, for only he perceives the just society and necessary social transformations to achieve that end.
The Age of Plato, vol.Totalitarian and Authoritarian Dictators: A Comparison of Fidel Castro and Alfredo Stroessner PAUL C. SONDROL Personal dictators remain a key feature of contemporary regimes termed.
What is Totalitarianism? On the other hand, totalitarianism is a complete form or an extreme form of authoritarianism. Everything is totally under the control of the single person called the dictator in the totalitarianism form of governance. Define Totalitarian dictators.
Totalitarian dictators synonyms, Totalitarian dictators pronunciation, Totalitarian dictators translation, English dictionary definition of Totalitarian dictators.
adj. Of, relating to, being, or imposing a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Dictators: A Comparison of Fidel Castro and Alfredo Stroessner PAUL C.
SONDROL Personal dictators remain a key feature of contemporary regimes termed 'authoritarian' or 'totalitarian', particularly in their early consolidating phases. Start studying AUTHORITARIANISM, FASCISM AND DICTATORS.
Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. How did the secret police in a totalitarian government most likely get their name? What actions characterize authoritarian .
Difference Between Fascism and Communism and Totalitarianism Difference Between Totalitarianism and Authoritarianism Difference Between Marxism and Leninism Difference Between Marxism and Neo-Marxism Difference Between Dictatorship and Monarchy.